Lize van der Merwe
2018-08-24 07:50:54 UTC
I used lme to fit a model which includes different variances for operators.
My question is:
What is the best way to report the operator standard deviations?
Here are the details.
My data contains an outcome, with predictors load (4 different loads) and
operator (10 different operators). It is a very large unbalanced data set,
with some operators only working on a single load while others operated on
all 4 loads. I am interested in the load means, the operator means and the
operator variances. The latter is my problem.
I used the model
lme(Outcome~Load,random=~1|Operator,weights = varIdent(form= ~ 1 |
Operator),Data)
I used intervals() to obtain estimates with 95% CIs of the effects of the
loads and the operators.
Because of identifiability, the model yields delta, the ratio of specific
operator standard deviation to first operator standard deviation with their
95% CIs. The attached plot shows the deltas, with their confidence
intervals.
Is it correct to state that, because the some of the CIs do not overlap, the
observer 4 is clearly less precise than some other observers?
Thankyou in advance for advice.
Regards
Lize van der Merwe
My question is:
What is the best way to report the operator standard deviations?
Here are the details.
My data contains an outcome, with predictors load (4 different loads) and
operator (10 different operators). It is a very large unbalanced data set,
with some operators only working on a single load while others operated on
all 4 loads. I am interested in the load means, the operator means and the
operator variances. The latter is my problem.
I used the model
lme(Outcome~Load,random=~1|Operator,weights = varIdent(form= ~ 1 |
Operator),Data)
I used intervals() to obtain estimates with 95% CIs of the effects of the
loads and the operators.
Because of identifiability, the model yields delta, the ratio of specific
operator standard deviation to first operator standard deviation with their
95% CIs. The attached plot shows the deltas, with their confidence
intervals.
Is it correct to state that, because the some of the CIs do not overlap, the
observer 4 is clearly less precise than some other observers?
Thankyou in advance for advice.
Regards
Lize van der Merwe